Central Connecticut
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
763  Brittany Mendelson JR 21:16
1,691  Madeline Mondo SO 22:14
1,816  Dawn Hubbell SO 22:22
2,112  Victoria Cronin JR 22:41
2,460  Brandy LeClair SR 23:06
3,110  Paxton McNierney SR 24:34
3,268  Morgan Ricci SO 25:13
National Rank #232 of 344
Northeast Region Rank #32 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 32nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Brittany Mendelson Madeline Mondo Dawn Hubbell Victoria Cronin Brandy LeClair Paxton McNierney Morgan Ricci
Iona Br. Paddy Doyle Meet of Champions 09/16 1349 22:00 22:46 22:01 22:44 25:03
Ted Owen Invitational 09/24 1382 22:23 22:31 22:26 23:21 25:36
NEICAAA Championship 10/08 1268 21:24 22:13 21:58 22:44 23:07 25:00
Northeast Conference Championship 10/29 1254 21:17 21:49 21:56 22:23 23:08 24:37 25:01
Northeast Region Championships 11/11 1299 21:31 22:12 22:11 23:53 22:45 24:12





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 30.5 893 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.3 2.2 4.3 6.4 11.8 16.2 19.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Brittany Mendelson 81.3 0.1
Madeline Mondo 174.6
Dawn Hubbell 185.6
Victoria Cronin 213.8
Brandy LeClair 240.9
Paxton McNierney 273.5
Morgan Ricci 283.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 0.2% 0.2 21
22 0.4% 0.4 22
23 0.5% 0.5 23
24 0.7% 0.7 24
25 1.3% 1.3 25
26 2.2% 2.2 26
27 4.3% 4.3 27
28 6.4% 6.4 28
29 11.8% 11.8 29
30 16.2% 16.2 30
31 19.7% 19.7 31
32 21.7% 21.7 32
33 9.9% 9.9 33
34 3.5% 3.5 34
35 1.1% 1.1 35
36 0.4% 0.4 36
37 0.2% 0.2 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0